Thursday, 5 July 2012

Problematizing Homosexuality

Qualities or characteristics of being a male or female, generally taken to engage more than an ability to play suitable roles in sexual or gender differences. These days, as much stress is placed on a single person’s understandings of and his/her reactions to ethnically and publicly derived gender disparities as on biological aspects in the growth of sexuality. Ever-increasing ‘broadmindedness’ towards homosexuality has resulted in a fundamental change of ethics and ways of our thinking.

Problematizing homosexuality is wary of engaging in fights over who belongs in the lesbian/gay/queer community and skeptical about the possibility of a criterion of belonging. The presence of such queerness may trouble the all male creatures (Ryan 237). But to confess it as an acceptable means of being would challenge the very culture of an ordered misdemeanor group. The culture of the mafia sternly polices the possibly raucous empires of gender and sexuality (Letzia 88). Its practices demand that men master, even bottle up their feelings, and not vent them. They have to subordinate their own individual requirements and needs to that of the communal, the mafia relatives. They should not be indecisive to wreak violence, including killings, if the leader deems it to be required. Setting up a marital relation is an additional obligatory standard of their manhood (Letzia 89).

As Judith Butler argues that these groups, a long way from being “expected,” are racially build through the recurrence of fashionable acts. Such acts, by being frequent in societies, create the form of an indispensable, ontological gender (Butler 140). The recurrence of such acts composes “performativity” of gender, and of sexuality. Performativity is equivalent of that we are formed through the behavioral patterns that shape our beings in traditional values with existing cultural principles (Butler 140). In our everyday lives, we reiterate and carry out our culture’s gender norms.